Free Shipping Both Ways, 365-Day Return PolicyRunning.zappos.comPowered by Zappos24/7 Customer Service 1.888.927.7677 | |||
Home Shop by Interest |  |
Do you own this product?
Write an online review and share your thoughts!
Do you own this product? ( ASICS Gel-Trail Attack™ 3 ) Write an online review and share your thoughts with other Zappos.com customers! 77% of Fit Survey respondents said this shoe "Felt a half size smaller than marked" 86% of Fit Survey respondents said this shoe "Felt true to width" 86% of Fit Survey respondents said this shoe had "Moderate arch support" Customer Rating/Review ASICS Gel-Trail Attack™ 3 Number of reviews: 3 Average customer ratings: Overall:  Comfort: Look:  2007-07-07 15:42:07 ASICS Gel-Trail Attack™ 3 Reviewer: Cain from Western Colorado Overall:
Comfort:
Look:Shoe Size: Felt true to size Shoe Width: Felt true to width Shoe Arch: Moderate arch support Light shoes, sore feet - I actually had the previous version of the Attack and loved them at first. Light, nimble, responsive, and great on soft trails, but a lot of my mileage is on dirt roads now and the shoes didn't seem to have enough support in the forefoot. The balls of my feet started aching and I started worrying about stress fractures. I put some insoles in them, but that didn't seem to help much. I tried on the Attack 3s and didn't like way the new tongue design felt - it impinged a bit too much on my instep. I went with the Gel Trabucos that fit a bit better and have loved them so far. I haven't tried the Inov8 that one of the other reviewers recommends, but my running buddy loves his. Other shoes recommended by reviewer: Gel Trabuco 2007-02-11 05:55:46 ASICS Gel-Trail Attack™ 3 Reviewer: Mike from Michigan Overall:
Comfort:
Look:Shoe Size: Felt true to size Shoe Width: Felt wider than marked Shoe Arch: Moderate arch support Great running shoe - Softer than the Adidas Trail Runner 9's I had. Only issue is that it seems there is a little too much extra width space for me in the toes but it doesn't affect my running at all. 2007-01-19 17:03:28 ASICS Gel-Trail Attack™ 3 Reviewer: Anonymous from Silver Spring, MD Overall: 
Comfort:
Look:Shoe Size: Felt a half size smaller than marked Shoe Width: Felt true to width Shoe Arch: Moderate arch support I like them, but they don't like me - I bought these to replace a pair of Nike Kyotees. The Kyotees aren't worn out, but were giving me problems from an inflexible forefoot. (I'm a 170 lb neutral gait midfoot striker, and run a large % of my mileage on trails.) These seemed to be the ideal alternative since they're light and responsive... no problems during a casual walk evaluation phase, so I 'got real' with them. In the first 45 minutes I thought I'd found THE shoe. Traction on a wet, muddy trail was middling, but I figured I could live with that since the shoes worked so well otherwise. Then the first problem - a hot spot on my heel after 45 minutes into the run. (blisters/hot spots are extremely unusual for me.) A day or so later I noticed significant pain in the balls of my feet. Subsequent uses confirmed the Attacks were the culprits... I'm SO hoping I can use them for more than short runs. Maybe they'll break in some, but I'm not optimistic... for comparison's sake, I got the Inov-8 Roclite 315 at the same time and figured that the Attacks would make the Roclites seem like a 'niche' shoe, just for sloppy trails. Now it seems the Attacks are the 'niche' shoes. I'm experimenting with more cushioned insoles in a salvage effort, but unfortunately the Attack isn't an 'out of the box' winner for me... I DO like the style and colors, but even there I encountered a setback. I described them to someone as being 'brick with orange-yellow trim' and when my wife saw them, she said they reminded her of McDonalds! (sigh.) Other shoes recommended by reviewer: Inov-8 Roclite 315 Top
Check the boxes and enter your e-mail address below and we'll let you know of:  | |
